If this law is made, then surly only the rich will benefit, LETS DO IT :/

Personally, I do believe that there are social structures, economic structures, and other man made structures that do limit people in todays America. Anything from racism to a flimsy social safety affects a persons job decision as well as his or her pay, along with many other things. Already, when the person wakes up one is faced with a disadvantage due to the laws of the land. Certain structures in place definitely limit people, which in turn limit class mobility and upward progression. An issue with a social structure that I have always disapproved of is the "Social Safety Net": "The U.S. safety net has historically been much thinner than those in other industrialized nations." America is one of the most developed countries in the world, yet it has a horrible social safety net system. If one is fishing with a net that has, big, wide netting, and all the fish can pass through it, then what's the point of that net? If thousands of people can fall through Americas social safety net and be left behind, then what's the point of it? Other systems used by other countries are better at solidifying people, in terms of staying afloat. Other countries poverty rates are much lower than the U.S.'s.

Another issue is the fact that there is a massive gap between the rich and poor and the fact that its growing is proof itself that the system in place doesn't work. Another issue that Collins draws upon is how during the 1990's "executive compensation grew to more than 500 times average worker pay." It is the current system that allows such a person to make so much money. It is also the current system that allows such a person to make so much money and not be taxed sufficiently. No doubt the CEO of a company should take home the majority of his or her earned money, but as Warren states "take a hunk of that and pay forward to the next kid that comes along." In other words, the government should tax the rich much more than they do now, this then will lead to more money being shared and distributed. In time the gap will lessen and perhaps the economy as a whole will be more healthy.  

 

natural disaster, yes...natural carnage, no

"New Orleans wasn't built just on a swamp. It was built, too, on the backs of black laborers. White supremacy helped make New Orleans an important place. In recent decades it has become a curiosity of little real import. If the city never recovers, it won't be just because of the natural environment. It will be because long ago the whites of New Orleans, and whites in Washington and around the nation, made a bargain with the devil of white supremacy, and now they, we, will have now lost it all."

A situation like Katrina could have been limited in terms of disaster. Through the reading of this article and the reading of the other Katrina article, along with #3 on the Zweig "Six Points on Class" I can't help but think this true. I feel as if through the centuries of greed and then the years of neglect, New Orleans became a horror story over a stormy night. Having only poor black folk, taking up the majority of the city, of a state that does not contribute much to the function of this country gives clear reason as to why they did not receive flood and water control over the years of asking for it. I really do believe that if it was a white state asking for it, they would have received the help long ago.

Of course class and race play a significant factor as well. Most of the black people being poor made them easy targets for Katrina. How can someone, renting out a space to live in with there family, whom has no disposable income and no means of transportation,evacuate that area. Its an extremely troubling thing to imagine. One of the reasons as to why they are so poor is because they live in an extremely poor part of the country. Which again goes along with the same level of how there state was termed as not important enough to build a levee that could potentially protect hundreds of thousands of people, homes, and centuries of culture.

It's just sad to read about how much damage that happened due to Katrina could have been alleviated. Louisiana was in good hands when the rich white people were present, but once they left, it all ended. Instead black people were neglected and the state was neglected as a whole... except with the common tourist of course. Perhaps what is more disgusting is the fact that certain people of high privilege think that the African Americans standard of living was so low in Louisiana that:“So many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this—this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them.” Sorry, but that is false. Granted I am assuming something... but I'm sure many of the "underprivileged" would have rathered been in there respective homes, sleeping on there own bed, being dirt poor-but alive and healthy-rather than sharing a bathroom with 100,000 other people going through the same tragedy as the next...

What Century do we live in Again?

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/09/nc-house-votes-to-put-gay-marriage-ban-on-ballot/1?csp=34news


Ok, it always came off as if people in the south were a bit old fashion and behind on, well...everything. This just goes alone with what seems to be a northern perception of the south. They are making it law that people who love each other can't marry each other. We live in the 21st century people...to each there own. Although a short article, I picked this one because it made me think if the homosexuals who want to marry, and can't, face any kind of inequality other than sexual (and to me LOVE INEQUALITY). Perhaps one of the couples would have qualified for a special program through there work where the pay is higher and the benefits are better if they are married? Or if they had a kid, would things be different for them economically as well? Or perhaps if the couple married they would have been able to set up a more solid retirement plan, or savings plan, yet because they aren't married they are limited to certain things by law? If issues like this do arise then this means they are being screwed out of money and perhaps a better lifestyle? Instead of singing "finally got a piece of the pie" they are stuck in the same position as usual.  I personally don't know much about things along these lines but I would not doubt there being some form of inequality along the points I just made above. The article does hint at people receiving a lack of benefits.

The First

I've never kept a blog before and the reason was because I did not know if I would like it. I am going to give it a try, seeing how it is a class requirement and perhaps I may enjoy it?  I am looking forward to this class.